The Legalization of Marijuana – Part 1 of 2

On July 30, 2001, the’ Narcotic Control Regulation’ was amended and the’ Marijuana Medical Access Regulation’ came into force. This sparked the start of a heated national debate, the topic in question becoming the legalization of marijuana for medical reasons in Canada. While marijuana is considered an illegal substance in Canada, it’s approved for use under specific circumstances. It is available for applicants who have a terminal illness with a prognosis of a life span of less than twelve weeks, those who suffer from particular symptoms related to certain serious health problems, and those that have problems associated with a serious medical condition, where conventional treatments have failed to reduce symptoms (Health Canada, “Medical Marijuana”).

Due to previous stigmatizations connected with marijuana use and the previous authorized benefits of its, public favor wasn’t in support for the recent Bill C-17; a Bill for cannabis law reform in Canada, that was passed on November one, 2004. The legislation allows an individual to have up to thirty grams of marijuana in their possession, within limits, while just receiving a nice (Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, “Cannabis Law Reform in Canada”). This particular Act is the closest the Canadian government has ever before come about toward legalizing marijuana. It is becoming progressively more evident that through Bill C-17, there will be potentially beneficial financial ramifications for the federal government, false community perceptions will lessen, and medical benefits of cannabis use will end up further valued. In the coming years, marijuana consumption will not be regarded as the social’ evil’ it once was, or still is. In light of the following information, it will become apparent that it’s not needed to prohibit marijuana consumption, but to regulate it.

To drug policy reformers, prohibition of marijuana isn’t just a purpose to be supported, but a necessary way of life, necessary to uphold society’s moral fiber. These activists don’t consider marijuana to be safe. Even though scientific info supports the absence of damaging effects of cannabis on the body; many continue to categorize it with dangerous substances including cocaine or heroin. It’s these’ marijuana myths’ that always affect the opinions of numerous Canadian citizens, although there’s an absence of fact driven info to allow for common social stigma.

A widespread perception amongst the general public is that marijuana is a’ gateway drug’, triggering the usage of much more harmful substances. Never has there been a consistent relationship between the use patterns of different drugs. While marijuana use has fluctuated through the years, tougher, more addictive drug use, for example LSD, remains the very same. The truth is, in 1999 under 16 % of high school students who smoked marijuana report trying cocaine (qtd. in Zimmer, 2). Yet another regular misconception is that excessive levels of marijuana use can be greatly addicting. While laboratory rats which are injected with THC and subsequently provided a cannabinoid receptor blocker do encounter some withdrawal symptoms, like disturbed loss and sleep of appetite, humans aren’t given’ blockers’. THC slowly leaves the human phone system, causing no serious withdrawal (Zimmer et al. forty seven). An investigation like this’s not appropriate to physical addiction in humans.

Finally, many people continue to believe that the detrimental effects of shark tank cbd gummies quit smoking where to buy (www.bainbridgereview.com) marijuana are greater then that of smoking tobacco products. Although, except for their psychoactive substances, tobacco and marijuana smoke are virtually identical, tobacco use is much more deadly compared to the latter. Mostly due to nicotine (cigarettes’ addictive quality), cigarette smokers tend to smoke 10 cigarettes one day, while normal cannabis smokers smoke under 5 (Zimmer et al. 62). Marijuana smoke also effects the lungs in a different manner than tobacco smoke does. “The nature of the marijuana induced changes were additionally different, occurring primarily in the lungs’ considerable airways – not the little peripheral airways afflicted by tobacco smoke. Since it is small airway inflammation which brings about chronic bronchitis as well as emphysema, marijuana smokers may not create these diseases” (Zimmer et al. sixty four).

These are just a couple of fundamental examples of the social stigmatization adjacent marijuana use, as you can find many others. When closer examined, none of these’ myths’ provide a great foundation for the prohibition of marijuana use; therefore its ban remains unfounded.

Invia il tuo messaggio su: