Herbal Medication Versus Quackery
By 1930, “Dr.” John R. Brinkley of Arkansas, Kansas had transplanted more than 16,000 goat testicles into men which desired to relive the youth of theirs. At $750 per procedure, he grew into a rich male. Needless to say, we will call his practice quackery at best.
The thing most individuals do not realize would be that due proven to fight off viral infections (you could try these out) loopholes of the law, individuals could be legally duped in very much the same way. You can take anything you want apart from recognized poisons and illegal drugs, package it up and advertise it as a food preservative. The one restriction is you can’t make statements of any healthcare advantage on the container itself. They could make as lots of claims as they desire away from the container. As long as those statements aren’t produced on the container itself, there’s simply no regulation on the product in the United States.
One very poor fellow which I noticed in the emergency room had a terrible circumstances of Rhus Dermatitis. That is the medical term for what’s generally called poison oak or poison ivy. He had started out getting a tiny area of rash on his arm. So, he went down to the local health food retail outlet and then spent money on a poison ivy treatment.
After taking the’ cure’ he proceeded to get greatly more terrible. By the time I saw him he had a rash all over the body of his and also was incredibly miserable. I found the reason by carefully looking at the bottle. The’ cure’ was a naturopathic remedy that have poison ivy in it! Exactly how ridiculous is the fact that?
The advertising that you see for some products causes it to be immediately obvious that the item is useless. Anyone trained in physiology and anatomy would know right away that the claims were false.
One great example is once the claims are contradictory. Rheumatoid arthritis & allergies are great examples of problems induced by overactive immune systems. Yet I have seen products say that they not only help with allergies however they improve the immune system. You cannot get it both ways folks.
The other thing that makes you go hmm… is once the advertising claims that the product causes specific physiologic changes within the body. Then they go on and also claim that the product doesn’t have a drug. Nonetheless, check the definition of a drug:’ A chemical applied to the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease’. Clearly, in case you’re claiming that the item of yours could be used to treat and prevent disease, you are talking about a drug. If you say that the chemical of yours does not contain a drug, next you cannot say it is stopping or treating an illness. Here again, you can’t have it each way.
Nonetheless, you might say, what I am taking is merely plant parts. When my father was in pharmacy school in the 1950’s, virtually all medicines were created by collecting plants and flowers and blending them in particular ways to cook drugs. Now, individuals do the exact same thing, though they are able to sell them as food aditives because they make zero statements about their properties’ on the container’.