DNA and the Evidence For PreBiotic Natural Intelligence
Sociologists assure us that only man creates symbols bulks and softens your poop (www.seattleweekly.com) simulates concrete relational order through the use of symbolic devices of order. Sociologists happily proclaim man the only community producing representative in nature; but I propose that we have to have an extreme rethinking of our picture of the job of DNA in bio-evolutionary history if we will progress beyond the outmoded conceptualization and that will continue to hold sway amongst biologists in spite of advances in info technology since the neo Darwinian synthesis was first formulated.
The proposal of mine to biological scientists is that DNA may appear to, on closer examination of the molecular order of its, come out to be a molecular computer system nanomachine running on an advanced statespace intelligence algorithm of some sort. The science of genetics need consider, seriously, the chance that so-called junk DNA could possibly incorporate some type of intelligence code. It is significant that nature had, in the symbolic process of the DNA molecule, in the boundaries of the sociological characterization, been “thinking,” creating as well as transmitting society for eons before male appeared. Guy could just stand for a fresh, before unexplored opportunity for Natural Intelligence in the art of culture creation and transmission.
The self imposed naivete of natural thought face-to-face with proof of a pre human system for symbolic modeling of physical relational order is amazing. Might Natural Intelligence have revealed the hands of its more plainly to Crick and Watson, to Tatum and Beadle?
A yawning gap separates the mere presence of a macro molecule as well as the exploitation of the chain structure of its in a technique for symbolic modeling of concrete relational order. It is something to have the alphabets; it’s a radically different thing to make use of the alphabets to invent a language by assigning references or “meaning” to usually meaningless symbols!
The genetic system accommodates the possibility, in what biologists carelessly believe are arbitrary mutations, for suggestion of alternate bio-physical orders. This is the essence of divergent thinking, innovation and creativity in intelligence systems.
How long is it going to take for molecular biologists to recognize that the genetic program might incorporate some form of syntax driven intelligence code?
Steven Pinker, in his How the Mind Works, attempted a working definition of intelligence. He was of the opinion that intelligence features a special “commodity:” information; and that what defines intelligent function eventually is info processing ability.